文章摘要
| 陈高逸.从古音韵论《黄帝内经·灵枢·阴阳二十五人》中“敦敦然”之正误[J].江西中医药大学学报,2007,(2):34-36. |
| 从古音韵论《黄帝内经·灵枢·阴阳二十五人》中“敦敦然”之正误 |
| Ancient Rimes Confirming the Mistake in Tun-tun-ran of the Hand Greater-Yin Meridian in Ling-shu |
| 修订日期：2007-04-02 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 黄帝内经,阴阳二十五人,经络,音韵 |
| 英文关键词: Huang Di Nei Jing,the Twenty-five Classes of Yin-Yang Person,Meridians,Phonology |
| 基金项目: |
| 陈高逸 |
| 美国康奈尔大学 纽约14850 |
| 摘要点击次数: 4496 |
| 全文下载次数: 5019 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 《黄帝内经.灵枢》中对阴阳二十五人的描述使用了共25个“然”字脚的形容字,惟“敦敦然”同时被用在了二处不同的地方,使人们对此质疑。明张介宾注《黄帝内经》时,认为二”敦敦然”虽同在,却有不同的含义。其他很少见有人解释。综合自明清以来对上古汉语诸韵部逐渐成熟的认识,因金形人手太阴经之“敦敦然”不与上下文押韵,故认为了此处之”敦敦然”乃笔误。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In Ling-shu,Huang Di Nei Jing,the text describes twenty-five classes of yin-yang person with twenty-five jan-ending adjective phrases,but only DunDun-Ran was used twice,resulting in today's belief that one of these two occurrences might be a mistake.In the Ming dynasty,when Zhang Jie Bin was annotating Huang Di Nei Jing,he wrote that even though the phrase has two occurrences in the treatise,each has its own meaning.This paper integrates the knowledge obtained in ancient Chinese phonology since the Ming and Qing dynasties.Due to the fact that the Dun-Dun-Ran of the Hand Greater-Yin Meridian does not rhyme with the rest of the rest of the treatise,it is believed that the phrase is indeed a mistake. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
|
|